Two chicken sandwiches. A $5.99 KFC Chicken Sandwich and a $2.86 McDonald's McChicken. One is a premium, thick-cut crispy fillet with a brioche bun. The other is a thin, value-tier patty that has anchored the McDonald's dollar menu for decades. The question isn't which tastes better — it's whether the KFC sandwich is worth twice the price.
How the price of each item has changed since launch — US dollars.
Depends what you mean by better. The KFC Chicken Sandwich is a larger, premium product with a thicker fillet (28g protein vs 21g) and a proper brioche bun. But it has 240 more calories, more than double the fat (38g vs 18g) and nearly twice the sodium — and costs more than twice as much ($5.99 vs $2.86). On pure nutrition per dollar, the McChicken wins by a wide margin.
The KFC Chicken Sandwich contains 650 calories versus 410 calories for the McDonald's McChicken — a difference of 240 calories. The KFC sandwich also has significantly more fat (38g vs 18g) and sodium (1,450mg vs 780mg). Both use similar breaded chicken, but the KFC fillet is substantially larger.
The McDonald's McChicken is significantly cheaper at $2.86 versus the KFC Chicken Sandwich at $5.99 in the US — the McChicken costs less than half the price. On a protein-per-dollar basis, the McChicken delivers 7.3g per $1 versus 4.7g per $1 for the KFC sandwich.